I think breaking away from the studio approach is a good idea too. I actually kind of like the old back pages that showcased army life. It was real.

You brought up an important point about sense of attachment and how I think this revamp fails to build on that. I think our PIONEER should have a section that encompasses news from the whole SAF and that that bit with news and updates about your unit or command. Surely, SAF has the resources to invest in that?

There’s also lots more alternatives to lifestyle pieces that are military-centric. What about photos from the archives? How about funny guides to military life? Even guides on how to cook food to taste like combat rations?

The idea for the Back Page seems to be for highlighting service women from the SAF – that women have a contribution too etc etc.
It is mentioned that defence news have been reduced from 6 to 2 pages too.

To opinion that its a case of objectifying women might be a tad harsh. But I do fret upon the studio model approach for the portraits. There are other sides, such as when off-work, to our army personnel’s life which could be photographed.

Perhaps announcements about defence treaties or commendations are still acceptable ‘losses’ in exchange for more exciting and more relevant lifestyle pieces.

Pioneer is still quite a must-read for me, but only for a sense of attachment to things I find familiar. I look forward to mentions of my ex-unit and formation in articles, more so those that highlight the achievements of my previous army colleagues / friends. (male/female)

Its still the content that matters. Army magazine gives me stuff about the army which only Pioneer has access to. Lifestyle advice – there’s loads of it elsewhere.